【2023.3.18-雅思小作文:双饼图-对比-同一时间,两类数值对象】
The charts below show the water consumption and income of Australian agricultural products in 2004.
注:“Dariy”修改为“Dairy”
[数据加工:对比——用水量 (levels of water consumption)和收入 (levels of income),写出两图之间的关联。具体可细分为以下特征:]
1.用水量大 vs 收入高
2.用水量大 vs 收入低
3.用水量小 vs 收入高
4.用水量小 vs 收入低
【数据分组】
组1: 【特征1(dairy, fruit)+特征4 (rice)】
组2: 【特征2 (livestock)+特征3 (crop, vegetable, sugar)】
Introduction
The pie charts illustrate the amount of water consumed in the production of agricultural products as well as the corresponding amount of money earned in 2004.
Body 1- 组1: 用水量大 vs 收入高;用水量小 vs 收入低
Dairy making was not only a large water consumer but also a great contributor of agricultural income. Roughly one third of water consumption was attributed to it, and so is the case with the money earned. Meanwhile, a similar situation was found in the production of fruit. Distinct from these two sectors, growing rice consumed a small portion of water (4%) and gained a limited proportion of earnings (1%).
Body 2- 组2: 用水量小 vs 收入高; 用水量大 vs 收入低
Water consumed by crops, vegetables and sugar were at low levels, whereas the incomes were at high levels. The opposite is the case with livestock. When it comes to crops, vegetables and sugar, the proportions of their contributions to total income were larger than those of water consumption, with the gap ranging from 7% and 12%. In terms of livestock, its earnings, in percentage terms, were one-ninth of its water consumption, which dominated in the total water use.
Conclusion
Overall, it is notable that livestock took the dominant position in the water use, while it is dairy and fruit that earned the largest proportion of income.
0元领取剑桥雅思系列真题解析、托福TPO、SAT考试真题,更多独家资料免费领取。